(8 pages) (APA citations) (in-text citations
are a must)
Everyday life is rich with examples of social psychology in action. Every trip to the café, the grocery store, or a sporting event lends itself to social psychological analysis. This paper assignment allows you to conduct a field observation, which you can then analyze using what you’ve learned in the course up to this point.
Complete Part A of your assignment (below). You may not realize this yet, but observing field behavior like a scientist is very different than casual “people watching.” To develop some ideas of what to consider in making your observations, first view the OWL website on observations, and this article in TIME Magazine about taking notes like a scientist. Finalize your hypothesis about something you expect to observe in a given situation (e.g., “I hypothesize that groups of women will be more likely than groups of men to order similar food at a restaurant”, “I hypothesize that individuals driving expensive cars will be more overtly frustrated by getting a red-light during rush hour than individuals driving inexpensive cars”). Write down your hypothesis and how you will make observations to test it. (Note that we will not be testing your results with statistics (phew), you will simply report what you observe).
Now, go to a public place or attend an event and observe the social interactions that take place during your visit. Plan to spend at least an hour observing your particular construct. Take hand-written notes of your observations. Then, using your knowledge of social psychology, complete Part B of your assignment.
Part A (2 pages)
Summarize the OWL site and the TIME Magazine article.
Write down your hypothesis.
Describe exactly how you will make and record your observations.
Part B (6 pages altogether)
Describe and analyze what you observed (2 pages)
Reference topics from the course; make specific connections to your textbook and cite (include page numbers) (3 pages)
Draw inferences about human behavior from what you observed. (1 page)
Part C (pages will vary based on your observation process)
Appendix – include a photograph(s) of your field notes
All Parts must be in APA style, in one document, with a cover page and reference page.
Category: Religion
-
Title: Observing Social Psychology in Everyday Life
-
Book Review: The Bigger Picture on Creation Study Guide by Krista K. Bontrager Krista K. Bontrager’s The Bigger Picture on Creation Study Guide is a comprehensive and thought-provoking resource for anyone seeking to
Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Write a 500-word book review for the below textbooks as concisely as possible.
Include the following: understanding/comprehension of the content, analysis that includes the strengths and weaknesses of the book, and relevance or application of the book to your ministry context or life. Include as much substance as possible, even while you remove every shred of excess. The goal for your writing should be “lucid brevity.”
Bontrager, Krista K. The Bigger Picture on Creation Study Guide. Glendora, CA: Reasons to Believe, 2008.
***The ATTACHED FILE has my notes highlighted in LESSONS 3 through 7***
Requirements: 500 Words Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Title and Reference Pages
Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure to include an introduction paragraph with a clear thesis statement in the last sentence of the introduction paragraph and a conclusion paragraph.
Please be sure to carefully follow the instructions.
No plagiarism & No Course Hero & No Chegg. The assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Please be sure to include at least one in-text citation in each body paragraph. -
Title: Bridging Cultures: An Interview and Bible Study with a Haitian American
The cultures I picked is North American and my own cultures is Haitian American from Haiti. 1. Conduct an interview with the person you chose from the target culture. Use the questions that you developed in previous units.
2. Then teach the Uncommon Power Bible Study to the person. It should take about 15 minutes. Be sure to follow the culturally relevant strategies you designed.
Part 2: Report
Write a 5-7 page paper about your experience. Utilize the Final Project Report Template. Include the following:
1. Introduction – (1/2 – 3/4 page)
2. Interview – (4 pages)
a. Interview Responses: Summarize the responses to the 8-10 interview questions.
b. Summary: Summarize your experience doing the interview. Was it awkward or comfortable? Did the interviewee readily give answers or was he/she sometimes hesitant? Also, discuss what you learned about the target culture. Was there any new information you didn’t know before?
3. Bible study – (approx. 1 page)
a. Summarize your experience teaching the Bible study. How well do you feel that you presented the Bible study? How was it received? Did your interviewee provide any feedback? If you give this Bible study again in the future, would you change anything about your presentation, and if so, what?
4. Reflection – reflect on your experience (1-2 pages)
a. In the interview and the Bible study, did you employ some of the cultural strategies you learned about in this course? If so, which ones? How did they affect your experience and the experience of your interviewee? Be specific.
b. What ideas do you have for reaching out to more people in the target culture? In a previous assignment, you shared 2-4 recommendations of strategies for effectively sharing the gospel with people from the target culture. Do you think those strategies are still appropriate or would you modify them based on this experience?
c. If my new friend comes to church and gets born again, what ideas do I have for helping him/her stay connected despite the cultural differences?
d. Overall, what did you learn from this experience? -
“Understanding Cultural Differences: A Comparative Analysis of My Own Culture and the Culture of Japan” Introduction: Cultural differences play a significant role in shaping the way people perceive and interact with the world around them. As a language student, it is crucial to
Step 1: Based on the exercise in unit 1, review the cultural differences between your own culture and the culture you are studying, then thoroughly review the material you have learned about the chosen culture and your own culture. You should spend 1-2 hours reviewing the following:
**Readings in the Morrison and Conaway text for the target country/culture and your own culture.
**Lectures and articles in the previous units that address cultural factors and witnessing someone from your target culture.
Step 2: Write a 3-page summary of the information you have learned about the culture. https://youtu.be/_eJc1yL3Yfghttps://youtu.be/_eJc1yL3Yfg?si=CWA345QfG-mB5SEz -
“Exploring the Views on Evil: A Comparison of Greek Philosophy and Hebrew Scripture”
In 850-900 words! Greek philosophy, Hebrew Scripture, and Buddhist teachings each have a view about evil. For this essay, select two of these worldviews. Then, compare the two. You might explain what one of them would say in answer to the other’s view about the nature of good and evil. For example, if a Buddhist encountered the Theory of Forms, what might they say in response? You might also simply explain which is more plausible to you any why.