ASSIGNMENT: Using your outline and annotated bibliography from Touchstones 1.2 and 2.2, draft a 6-8 page argumentative research essay on your chosen topic.
As this assignment builds on Touchstone 2.2: Create an Annotated Bibliography, that Touchstone must be graded before you can submit your research essay draft. Although unrelated by topic, Touchstone 3.1 must also be graded before you can submit your research essay draft.
Sample Touchstone 3.2
In order to foster learning and growth, all work you submit must be newly written specifically for this course. Any plagiarized or recycled work will result in a Plagiarism Detected alert. Review Touchstones: Academic Integrity Guidelines for more about plagiarism and the Plagiarism Detected alert. For guidance on the use of generative AI technology, review Ethical Standards and Appropriate Use of AI.
A. Assignment Guidelines
DIRECTIONS: Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines. Refer to the Sample Touchstone for additional guidance on structure, formatting, and citation.
1. Argumentative Thesis Statement
❒ Have you included a thesis in your introduction that includes a clear, arguable stance and supporting reasons?
2. Argument Development
❒ Are all of the details relevant to the purpose of your essay?
❒ Is the argument supported using persuasive rhetorical appeals and page/paragraph-numbered source material (i.e., direct quotations, paraphrasing, and summary)?
❒ Is your essay 6-8 pages (approximately 1500-2000 words, not including your references or reflection question responses)? If not, which details do you need to add or remove?
❒ Does the essay consist of at least seven paragraphs – an introduction, five body paragraphs (with at least one for the counterarguments and rebuttals), and a conclusion? Are the body paragraphs ordered logically to strengthen the argument, and do they all contain accurate evidence from credible sources?
❒ Do your topic sentences make original and supportable points? Do your topic sentences directly support your thesis statement?
3. Research
❒ Have you introduced, contextualized, and cited outside sources effectively using at least some direct quotation, summary, and paraphrase techniques and included page/paragraph-numbered parenthetical citations?
❒ Are the sources incorporated smoothly, providing the reader with signal phrases and context for the source information?
❒ Have you referenced a range of at least 7 credible sources, and does each source have at least one accurate in-text citation in the essay?
❒ Have you properly formatted your citations according to APA style guidelines?
❒ Have you included an APA style reference page below your essay and do the sources listed there match those cited in the essay?
4. Reflection
❒ Have you answered all reflection questions including specific and concrete examples that provide thoughtful insight in all responses?
❒ Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment?
B. Reflection
DIRECTIONS: Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.
Provide one example of a place where you have used rhetorical appeals or source material to support your argument. How does this enhance your essay? (2-3 sentences)
Touchstone 4 is a revision of this draft. What kind of feedback would be helpful for you as you revise? Are there parts of your draft that you’re uncertain of? (3-4 sentences)
Category: Research methods
-
Title: The Impact of AI Technology on Academic Integrity: An Argumentative Research Essay
-
Title: Reflection on This Week’s Readings and Videos This week’s readings and videos covered a range of topics, from the importance of empathy and compassion to the power of positive thinking. As I engaged with each piece, I found myself reflecting
In your reflection, please include your own perspective, thoughts, insights,
what you learned, and what you want to remember about each of the readings/videos this week. -
Title: Coding Transcript for Qualitative Research Analysis
I provided my transcript below. All that must be done is coding it. The coding manual is below
The transcript must be coded according to the instructions in the coding manual
In Vivo Codes are taken directly from the text.
Descriptive Codes summarize the meaning of an excerpt.
Values Codes are the subjective, first impressions of the researcher. -
“Analyzing and Interpreting Data: A Comprehensive Approach”
-Assignment information is located in the documnet titled ”
Homework: Big Picture Assignment Instructions”
MUST HAVE SPSS SOFTWARE Homework: Big Picture – Analysis Assignment Template) -
Exploring My Major: Understanding and Discoveries through Various Sources
Find one of each of these:
book
video
professional society (e.g. BMES, American Historical Association)
website from a university department
general knowledge website (e.g. US News and World Report)
that describe your field. You need one of each, and they should give descriptions about your field that you find satisfying and are able to understand. If you do not understand what you are reading, choose different sources.
Read ALL of these 5 items to augment your understanding of what your field is about, and what the common subfields are within it. Then put the sources away, think about what your major is about, based on the 5 sources that you have read. Work on your assignment without looking at the sources while you are writing. There should be no quoted or plagiarized text in any part of your submission. If in doubt, review the plagiarism information from the Course Basics module before completing this assignment.
IN YOUR OWN WORDS write a <300 word description analysis of your understanding (exceeding 300 will result in deductions), that includes: Having read these 5 items-- what did you learn about your major that is new or different from what your impression of it was before (describe at least 2 differences)? Did the readings (and video) information at all change your interest in your major and why? Think about what you have learned about the different subfield in your major. Which subfield do you feel most aligned with and why do you find it the most interesting? How might you envision yourself working in this subfield in the future (i.e. after graduation/in the "real" world)? Not included in the 300 word limit: Bibliography containing FULL citation details for the 5 sources that you used, e.g. name of source and URL, full reference e.g. title/authors/journal information, etc. Indicate specifically which sources were magazine article, video, etc. The book and any journal article citations should be in standard APA or MLA format . Videos and URL should be in format such as shown here: https://www.mendeley.com/guides/web-citation-guideLinks to an external site.Links to an external site. You do not need to include in text citations in your description. Submit as .doc or .docx file or .pdf. Format as 2 separate sections, one for each numbered item above and remember to answer all questions in each. Make it clear what question you are answering. ZERO TOLERANCE FOR PLAGIARISM! If ANY evidence of plagiarism is found, even half a sentence, you will receive a zero on the assignment and I am obligated to report to SJA. If you are not sure what counts as plagiarism, review the video from the Course Basics module and the readings on plagiarism. If any part of your work partly copies a published work, including the internet, that is plagiarism. Do not use inappropriate quoting to substitute for putting things in your own words. Big Tip for avoiding plagiarism: Read the source material, put it away, and write from your understanding of the material in your own words. Also try running your writing through a plagiarism checker yourself before submitting it. Rubric: Thoughtful answer that includes specific details about what was new. Clearly described why or why not the new information gained changed idea or interest in major. Clearly states why they feel aligned with that subfield and how they envision working in this subfield in the future List of 5 sources. Clear what types of sources they are. References are in correct format. < or = 300 words -
“Exploring the Feasibility and Viability of 3D-Printed Houses: A Comprehensive Pilot Project”
**Introduction:**
The advent of 3D printing technology has revolutionized various industries, including construction, by offering innovative solutions for building design and fabrication. One particularly promising application is the construction of 3D-printed houses, which has the potential to significantly impact the future of housing construction. This pilot project aims to explore the feasibility and viability of 3D-printed houses as a sustainable and cost-effective housing solution.
**Aim:**
The aim of this pilot project is to investigate the feasibility, practicality, and effectiveness of constructing 3D-printed houses using advanced additive manufacturing techniques. By conducting a comprehensive pilot study, we seek to assess the technical capabilities, structural integrity, and economic viability of 3D-printed housing technology in real-world applications.
**Objectives:**
1. To review existing literature and case studies on 3D-printed housing technology to understand the current state-of-the-art and identify key challenges and opportunities.
2. To establish partnerships with industry stakeholders, including 3D printing technology providers, construction firms, regulatory authorities, and potential end-users, to facilitate collaboration and knowledge exchange.
3. To design and develop a prototype 3D-printed house using state-of-the-art additive manufacturing techniques, considering factors such as structural stability, thermal performance, and architectural design.
4. To conduct structural testing and analysis to evaluate the performance and durability of the 3D-printed house prototype under various loading conditions and environmental factors.
5. To assess the economic feasibility and cost-effectiveness of 3D-printed housing compared to traditional construction methods, including initial capital investment, operating costs, and long-term maintenance expenses.
6. To evaluate the environmental sustainability and carbon footprint of 3D-printed housing technology, considering factors such as material usage, energy consumption, and waste generation throughout the construction process.
7. To engage with local communities and potential end-users to gather feedback, assess user acceptance, and address social and cultural considerations related to 3D-printed housing design and implementation.
8. To document and disseminate the findings, lessons learned, and best practices from the pilot project to inform future research, policy development, and industry adoption of 3D-printed housing technology. -
Title: The Impact of Social Media on Mental Health: Exploring the Negative Effects and Potential Solutions
You will need a total of 5-6 sources for this essay.
Choose a topic.
Do preliminary research using Radiolab or Points of View. This article or podcast will count as your first source.
Identify a topic.
Create a preliminary argumentative research question based on your initial research. Answer the question to create a working thesis or claim.
Use the methods that you learned during the library instruction class to find 4-5 additional sources for your research question. At least three of these sources must come from the library’s databases or Google Scholar. You may use 1 source that you identify from a simple Google search, but you must show these sources to your professor for his approval.
Read and annotate your sources.
Based on this research, refine your preliminary research question, and create a strong argumentative claim or thesis.
Write an exploratory, a middle draft, and a final draft.
Refer to your research often in your essay and use evidence that is thoughtfully selected, analyzed, and explained in terms of your claim or thesis.
Use at least 8-10 parenthetical citations in the essay.
Write a final draft that is that is at least 5-7 pages long.
Create a work cited page. -
Title: Causes, Logical Models, and Variables in the Study of Social Anxiety Disorder
a) What types of necessary and sufficient causes do you identify in this study?
b) What type of a logical model are you following in this proposal? Deduction or induction, and how?
c) At what different levels do you create your variables? i.e. nominal, ordinal, interval or ratio? Describe how and why?
d) What kinds of spurious and non-spurious relationships could be noted among the variables in this study?
*NO PLAGIARISM
*NO AI USE
*TOPIC IS ABOUT SOCIAL ANXIETY DISORDER -
“Analyzing Real-World Surveys: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Quantitative and Qualitative Methods”
NO AI !!!!!! SCHOOL CHECKS AND WILL NOT ACCEPT
The objective of this assignment is to apply the concepts learned about quantitative and qualitative research methods to evaluate real-world surveys. You will collect various types of surveys from different sources (use the receipts at fast food restaurants or stores, healthcare follow-up surveys, customer service surveys, market survey, etc.) and analyze them using appropriate quantitative and qualitative techniques.
Instructions:
Select a minimum of three different types of real-world surveys. These surveys should cover diverse areas such as customer service, market survey, healthcare follow-ups, etc. Ensure that both quantitative and qualitative questions are part of at least one of your surveys.
Evaluate each selected survey both quantitative and qualitative methods based on the following criteria:
Quantitative Analysis:
Identify and explain the primary elements of the quantitative method section in each survey.
Assess the survey design, sampling procedures, data collection methods.
Based on what you know about the survey, discuss how the data could be analyzed and discuss any concerns with the validity of the quantitative findings and potential biases.
Qualitative Analysis:
Identify the basic characteristics of the qualitative data collected in each survey.
Evaluate the study design, data collection procedures, sample sizes, ethical considerations, and data analysis techniques.
Based on what you know about the survey, discuss how the data could be analyzed and discuss any concerns with the validity of the quantitative findings and potential biases.
Write a comprehensive report that includes the following sections:
Introduction
Quantitative Analysis: Present the findings of the quantitative analysis for each survey, including a discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of the data analysis techniques employed.
Qualitative Analysis: Present the findings of the qualitative analysis for each survey, including a discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of the data analysis techniques employed.
Comparison and Conclusion: Compare the data analysis techniques used in quantitative and qualitative approaches, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses. Discuss how researchers can ensure rigor and trustworthiness in their data analysis processes across different research paradigms. Conclude by reflecting on your preferred approach for data analysis. -
“Evaluating Nonexperimental Studies in Psychology: A Critical Analysis of Current Research”
.Post: This assignment will require you to find and evaluate a nonexperimental study on a topic of your choice in the field of psychology. This will take time and develop your research skills, as you must find an original, empirical, quantitative research article published within the last 5 years over a topic of your choosing in the field of psychology to evaluate. You will further hone your research skills by locating an article referenced by a peer and evaluating it. Reading, evaluating, and communicating research findings using professional standards are skills that will allow you to stay abreast of current and emerging topics in your field for the rest of your professional career.
The “Bookshelf” document should help you access the textbook titled “Research Methods, Statistics and Applications” Chapter 9, which can be used as an aid.