Category: Science

this will take at 20min really the answer don’t have to be long Dr. Neira discusses the known human health effects, particularly to the central nervous system, of air pollution and why air pollution is a global environmental health issue in her TED talk – This is Your Brain on Air Pollution. After watching the video, think back to Stuart Firestein’s “Pursuit of Ignorance” talk. How do Firestein’s main points apply to Dr. Neira’s call to action regarding the effects of air pollution on human health? Based on the evidence presented by Dr. Neira, what questions still need to be asked and answered regarding the effects of air pollution on human health? What can the individual do, aside from putting pressure on politicians, to help address issues of poor air quality?

Touchstone: Sensory transduction: Learn why you feel pain when you get hit by a rock Lab Report
ASSIGNMENT: In this unit, you will complete the lab titled Sensory transduction: Learn why you feel pain when you get hit by a rock. Now it is time to write up your lab report describing the hypothesis and conclusions you drew from the lab experience.
By completing the lab report, you will demonstrate your ability to do the following:
Describe the lab’s overall objective and make a hypothesis
Introduce relevant background knowledge on the topic
Summarize the steps taken in the lab simulation
Explain any obtained results
Discuss the conclusions and implications
Download the lab report file. IMPORTANT: You must submit this completed template file as your Touchstone.
Lab Report – Sensory Transduction: Learn why you feel pain when you get hit by a rock
The document is a Microsoft Word file. You will type your answers directly into the boxes provided and submit it as a Word file. Any other submission file or format will be returned ungraded.
In order to foster learning and growth, all work you submit must be newly written specifically for this course. Any plagiarized or recycled work will result in a Plagiarism Detected alert. Review Touchstones: Academic Integrity Guidelines for more about plagiarism and the Plagiarism Detected alert. For guidance on the use of generative AI technology, review Ethical Standards and Appropriate Use of AI.
A. Directions
Step 1: Download and review the lab report file.
Step 2: Complete the simulation and fill in each part of the lab report file as you work through the Activity. Prompts in the lab report will help you develop your responses.
Follow the process presented to you in the How to Write a Lab Report lesson to ensure you write a thorough lab report entry.
Review the grading rubric (below) to make sure you have an understanding of how your lab report will be graded.
Step 3: Once you’ve completed the lab simulation and your lab report, review the submission requirements (below) and update your lab report to ensure it meets the recommended requirements.
Step 4: Once your lab report template is complete, submit it for grading.
Refer to the checklist below throughout the Touchstone process. Do not submit your Touchstone until you meet these guidelines.
❒ Did you review the Lab Manual before starting the simulation?❒ Did you complete the lab simulation?❒ Did you refer to the lesson on How to Write a Lab Report?❒ Did you complete all 5 sections of the Lab Report file?❒ Did you review the Touchstone rubric and compare it to your lab report❒ Did you submit the provided Lab Report file as your Touchstone for grading?B. Rubric
Advanced (100%)Proficient (85%)Acceptable (75%)Needs Improvement (50%)Non-Performance (0%)
Objective and Hypothesis
Describe the overall objective of the simulation and make a hypothesis (if applicable). (18%)Clearly describes the purpose of the simulation and makes a hypothesis. Purpose and hypothesis are well-aligned with the simulation and are paraphrased in the student’s own words.Describes the purpose of the simulation and makes a hypothesis. Both are aligned with the simulation and are paraphrased in the student’s own words, but are less clear and specific.Describes a purpose and a hypothesis that are only loosely aligned with the simulation.Either the description of the simulation’s purpose or the hypothesis is missing, or they are not paraphrased in the student’s own words.Does not describe the purpose of the simulation or a hypothesis. Response may be totally off-topic or absent.
Background Knowledge
Introduce relevant background knowledge on the topic described in the simulation. (18%)
Lists at least 3 examples of relevant background knowledge on the topic from the simulation Lab Manual or other resources.Lists at least 2 examples of relevant background knowledge on the topic from the simulation Lab Manual or other resources.Lists at least 1 example of relevant background knowledge on the topic from the simulation Lab Manual or other resources.Lists at least 1 example but its connection to the simulation is unclear.Response does not offer any background knowledge on simulation. Response may be totally off-topic or absent.
Summary and Steps
Summarize the steps taken in the simulation. (18%)
Summarizes all steps taken in the simulation and all equipment and techniques used. Summary is organized in a way that the reader understands the logical flow of the lab.Summarizes most of the steps taken in the simulation and lists some equipment and techniques used. Summary is organized in a way that the reader mostly understands the logical flow of the lab.Summarizes some of the steps taken in the simulation and lists some of the equipment and techniques used. Summary is organized in a way that the reader somewhat understands the logical flow of the lab.Summary is missing most of the steps in the simulation and most of the equipment and techniques used. Summary may contradict the simulation or be organized illogically.Summary does not include any steps taken in the simulation, or equipment and techniques used. Response may be totally off-topic or absent.
Results
Explain the obtained results from the simulation. (18%)
Accurately explains most of the obtained results of the simulation, if the results were expected or unexpected, and why.Accurately explains some of the obtained results of the simulation, and if the results were expected or unexpected.Explains some of the results of the simulation, but may contain some inaccuracies. Does not explain if the results were expected or unexpected.Explanation of results is entirely inaccurate or contradicts the simulation. Does not explain if the results were expected or unexpected.Does not explain any obtained results or if the results were expected or unexpected. Response may be totally off-topic or absent.
Conclusions and Implications
Discusses the conclusions and implications of the simulation. (18%)
Clearly and specifically summarizes how the results of the simulation relate to the original purpose and hypothesis; correctly identifies systematic sources of error; and reflects on what was learned.Summarizes the results of the simulation but their relationship to the original purpose and hypothesis may be less clear; correctly identifies systematic sources of error; and reflects on what was learned.Completes 2 of 3 tasks: summarizes how the results of the simulation relate to the original purpose and hypothesis; correctly identifies systematic sources of error; and reflects on what was learned.Completes 1 of 3 tasks: summarizes how the results of the simulation relate to the original purpose and hypothesis; correctly identifies systematic sources of error; and reflects on what was learned.Completes none of the tasks. Response may be totally off-topic or absent.
Conventions and Proofreading
Submission follows conventions for standard written English. (10%)
There are almost no errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization.There are minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization that do not impede readability.There are frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization that somewhat impede readability.There are consistent errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization that significantly impede readability.Submission does not meet the minimum threshold for points to be awarded.
C. Requirements
The following requirements must be met for your submission to be graded:
Use the provided lab report file completed with a readable 11- or 12-point font.
Composition must be original and written for this assignment and all writing must be appropriate for an academic context.
Plagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited.
Submission must include your name and the date.
Only submit the completed lab report file saved in .doc or .dox format as your assignment submission.
D. Additional Resources
The following resources will be helpful to you as you work on this assignment:
How to Write a Lab Report lesson
Activity Page

i will provide you with a high quality explanation to each of you problem in easiest way possible. You’ll get quick and well response for you query and all the answers will be genuine and error less. Hope you’ll approach me❤

The eye has several main parts:
1. **Cornea**: The transparent outer layer that covers the front of the eye.
2. **Pupil**: The opening in the center of the iris that allows light to enter the eye.
3. **Iris**: The colored part of the eye that regulates the amount of light entering the eye by adjusting the size of the pupil.
4. **Lens**: Focuses light onto the retina at the back of the eye.
5. **Retina**: The light-sensitive layer at the back of the eye that contains cells called rods and cones, which convert light into electrical signals.
6. **Optic Nerve**: Transmits these electrical signals from the retina to the brain, where they are interpreted as visual images.
These parts work together to enable vision by capturing light, focusing it, and converting it into neural signals that the brain can interpret as images.

1st Paper ~ Ted Kennedy Incident:
Ted Kennedy’s Chappaquiddick Incident: What Really Happened | HISTORY
Links to an external site.
You must use your textbook as a source, and you must also use five other additional outside sources for your paper (a total of at least 6), and three of these should be scholarly in nature. For example, you may use the internet, academic journal databases, books, encyclopedias, videos, newspapers, etc. So, a minimum of six (6) sources are required.
Both Research papers must consist of the following – No Abstract
– Must Use in 1st Paragraph ~ Title of The Paper as the heading for first paragraph
*** This is an introduction that contains the thesis in last sentence but does not have an Introduction as a heading, but the Title of the Paper
* Must Use the subheadings (do not include hint underneath) listed in order below in your paper for organization, consistency and coherency of the overall paper:
Description of the research subject(hint ~ Write an overview of the subject you are researching for that paper)
Analysis of the crime event or events(hint ~ your decision on what crime or crime events you want to write on for that paper based on your research)
Description of media involvement and coverage(hint ~ write to the media coverage, how much, what venue, what did they cover, did it change over time, i.e., during the event, trial, etc.)
Perspective concerning the media influence
(hint: What is your perspective (not your Opinion) based on your research backed up with citations and sources on how the media influenced this matter? It could be what impact it had while it was going on, afterward, trials, currently, etc.).
Conclusion (hint ~ The paper’s conclusion wraps it all up for the reader who is your grade)
** (Overall the last hint ~ Review APA Module Again before submitting the papers ~ I structured this approach so that one segment flows nicely into the next one. Again, sentences should not be more than 25-30 words. Paragraphs approx. 5 sentences. Use APA 7 citations and references). Be sure to use proper paragraphs and indent your paragraphs.
Format
Each paper must be in APA 7 format (NO ABSTRACT) and include a title page, body *Thesis is the last sentence in the first paragraph of the body* (include subheadings above), and references/work cited page. Intext citations are required when citing your sources and must be in the correct APA format. Be sure to use proper paragraphs and indent your paragraphs.The length of the body of each paper is to be 1500, written in 12-point font and double-spaced, papers should be a minimum of 1500 words, not counting the title page, and reference page. Papers are to be submitted through the canvas course website.
Assignment Submission Policies
Submissions are to be submitted in MS Word or Adobe PDF.
When submitting an assignment, you are responsible for saving a copy before submitting it, in the event the Course website computer system malfunctions. Save the assignment on your computer hard drive or a removable medium then submit the assignment.
Save the file in the format “LASTNAME_FIRSTNAME-FINALPAPER” without the # symbol in the file name.
All writing assignments will be submitted to turnitin.com through the course link on the Course website. All work must be original to you and done for the first time this semester for this class./courses/279856/files/27704952?wrap=1 No AI work will be permi
Actions Providing 2 Sample Papers to help you with this class:Sample Paper CCJ3032.pdfActionsSample Paper 2 CCJ3032.pdfActions this is the textbook Jewkes, Y., and Linneman, T. (2018) Media and Crime in the U.S., Sage Publications.

Discussion Fats
1. Instructions: Read the scenario, and post your answers to the questions that follow. Posts must be at least 5-6 sentences in length.
Advertisements often claim that fats are bad. Your classmate Mike asks, “If fats are so bad for us, why do we need to have any in our diets?” How would you answer him?
2. Which of the following would you recommend?
Energy (kcal) Total fat (grams) Saturated fat (grams) Cholesterol (mg)
Regular ground beef, 3.5 oz cooked 273 18 7 82
Ground chuck, 3.5 oz cooked 232 14 5 86
Ground round, 3.5 oz cooked 204 11 4 82
Ground sirloin, 3.5 oz cooked 164 6 3 76
Review the table above. Taking into consideration the nutrition information listed for each type of ground beef, cooking methods, and expense, select which type you would recommend. Explain the reasons behind your recommendation.

Each student will be required to develop a professional practice statement. The assignment should be a thoughtful and reflective essay that addresses the student’s reasons for becoming an advanced practice registered nurse, personal philosophy for nursing practice, and goals for the future. The paper should be approximately 2-3 pages, including references (2-3 references please). Please use APA 7th ed. format, no abstract is necessary. You may write in the first person since this is a reflection. Rubric
Reasons for becoming an advanced practice registered nurse. 25%
Personal philosophy for nursing practice. 25%
Goals for the future. 25%
Grammar, sentence structure, written paper and references in APA (7th ed.) format (excluding first person). 25% Due to the dropbox by 6/4 11:59pm

What do you think the role of the APRN is in quality improvement? How do Nurse Practitioners improve quality of care?
Discussion Forum Grading and Guidelines To earn full credit, you must:
– Post your initial response, answering all discussion questions/prompts in full. Initial post should not exceed 500 words.
– Ensure that your initial post and peer reply is based on what you are learning in the readings and through scholarly research. When appropriate, draw on any any professional experience(s) you may have.-
-Ensure all posts use proper grammar and spelling. Discussion forum posts will be graded for thorough reflection of the topic at hand and whether the content answers the questions expertly with elaboration and explanation. It will also be evaluated for style, tone and structure. Thus, if there are spelling and grammatical errors, it deflects from the reading and points will be taken off. – Use proper APA format to cite sources.
https://nursekey.com/continuous-quality-improvemen…

What do you think are the most important factors in successful role transition from RN to APRN? What do you think can benefit the transition? What can act as a barrier?
Discussion Forum Grading and Guidelines To earn full credit, you must:
Post your initial response, answering all discussion questions/prompts in full. Initial post should not exceed 500 words.
Post at least one thoughtful reply to a peer in your group. Replies must be reflective in nature (not simply stating “I agree/disagree…”). Ensure that your initial post and peer reply is based on what you are learning in the readings and through scholarly research. When appropriate, draw on any any professional experience(s) you may have.
Ensure all posts use proper grammar and spelling. Discussion forum posts will be graded for thorough reflection of the topic at hand and whether the content answers the questions expertly with elaboration and explanation. It will also be evaluated for style, tone and structure. Thus, if there are spelling and grammatical errors, it deflects from the reading and points will be taken off. Use proper APA format to cite sources.
https://bmcnurs.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186…

Although one of the assignments and modules in this course involve ethical education in the Advanced Practice role, do you think it should be required? How do you think your increased scope of practice will influence your ethical decision making, and if you think (and you might not!) ethics will play a role in this decision making, how prepared are you for this? What do you think your ethical thinking has been shaped by?
Discussion Forum Grading and Guidelines To earn full credit, you must:
Post your initial response, answering all discussion questions/prompts in full. Initial post should not exceed 500 words.
Ensure that your initial post and peer reply is based on what you are learning in the readings and through scholarly research. When appropriate, draw on any any professional experience(s) you may have.
Ensure all posts use proper grammar and spelling. Discussion forum posts will be graded for thorough reflection of the topic at hand and whether the content answers the questions expertly with elaboration and explanation. It will also be evaluated for style, tone and structure. Thus, if there are spelling and grammatical errors, it deflects from the reading and points will be taken off. Use proper APA format to cite sources.
https://nursing.jhu.edu/magazine/articles/2018/02/…
https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/nursing-excellence/ethics/