Category: Writing

Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to reflect on this week’s module resources of how children learn language and literacy at home.
Directions (For this reflection, you can create a document or video):
Select an item (song, object, symbol, color, poem, work of art or film) that represents your understanding of this week’s readings.
Describe why you selected that specific item
Describe how it represents your analysis and understanding of the readings.
You must reference this week’s resources in your analysis.
You may choose to submit a document (minimum 250 -400 words), or a video or recording (3-5 minutes)
Criteria for Evaluation: See Rubric Below
Type of Assignment: IndividualPossible Points: 20
How to Submit Assignment: Upload to Canvas 
If Submitting a Document  (PDF)
Include a picture or graphic of your object
Written explanation should be between 250 – 400 words
In your explanation include specific references to the module resources


https://www.hanen.org/Helpful-Info/Early-Literacy-Corner/Literacy-at-Home.aspx

W7 Assignment
Risk Management
Read the business case
Review the Organization Charts
Locate the risk register template below
1.     List and briefly describe four methods for identifying risks.
2.     Create a risk register using the risk register template.  Identify at least three risks.  Enter a risk number, rank, description, potential response and impact for each risk identified. 
Your paper should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards. Please include citations to support your ideas.
will provide chart

Please discuss the evolution of Mesoamerica and explain the importance of Columbus and De las Casas in the story of colonialism. Furthermore, what does Menchaca argue with respect to Spain’s “racial foundations” and “whiteness”? Discuss the course of African slavery and explain the danger in any nation not acknowledging the presence of a Black population.
Here are examples of in-text citations for your paper:
(Menchaca, pg. XX), (Resendez Lecture, YouTube), (Hortua Lecture Recording, Module X) and any other video/article that could tie into your paper

Choose a patient-care situation in which the RN should intervene and advocate for the patient. An example of such a situation might be when a patient has not been given complete informed consent.
Include the following in your paper:
Describe the clinical situation concisely and descriptively. It can be an actual situation or a hypothetical one.
Apply the Bioethical Decision Making Model to the specific clinical ethical situation that you choose. Address each section of the model in your paper.
Conclude with a discussion of nursing advocacy in the clinical setting and the nurse’s role as a patient advocate. Your paper should be 4-5 pages.
You must reference and cite 1-2 scholarly sources other than your text. Include a title page and a reference page to cite your text and adhere to APA formatting.
Review the rubric for further information on how your assignment will be graded.
Rubric
NURS_521_DE – Advocacy Paper Rubric
NURS_521_DE – Advocacy Paper Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
50 to >43.5 ptsMeets Expectations
Content is clear, thorough, and organized effectively. Main points are well supported. Meets all of the criteria of the written assignment.
43.5 to >37.5 ptsApproaches Expectations
Content is somewhat clear, thorough, and organized effectively. Some points are well supported. Meets most of the criteria of the written assignment.
37.5 to >29.5 ptsBelow Expectations
Content is generally unclear, not thorough, and organized ineffectively. Main points are not well supported. Meets only a few of the criteria of the written assignment.
29.5 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Content is disconnected, unorganized, and does not meet the criteria of the written assignment.
50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity and Coherence
50 to >43.5 ptsMeets Expectations
Writing flows smoothly from one idea to another. Writer has taken pains to assist the reader in following the logic of the ideas expressed.
43.5 to >37.5 ptsApproaches Expectations
Sentences are mostly structured to clearly communicate ideas. Transitions between paragraphs make the writer’s points easy to follow.
37.5 to >29.5 ptsBelow Expectations
Sentence structure and word choice sometimes interfere with clarity of content and distract the reader.
29.5 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Poor sentence structure, sentences do not make sense; no clarity evident in the paper.
50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences and Citations Within the Body of the Paper
12.5 to >10.88 ptsMeets Expectations
The required number of scholarly references is used and cited skillfully throughout the paper.
10.88 to >9.38 ptsApproaches Expectations
The required number of scholarly references is used but some may not be cited accurately or skillfully throughout the paper.
9.38 to >7.38 ptsBelow Expectations
The required number of scholarly references is not used and most are not cited accurately or skillfully throughout the paper.
7.38 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
References or citations are not included in the body of the paper and writing indicates none were used.
12.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and APA
12.5 to >10.88 ptsMeets Expectations
The assignment consistently follows current APA format and is free from errors in formatting, citation, and references. No grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources are cited and referenced correctly.
10.88 to >9.38 ptsApproaches Expectations
The assignment consistently follows current APA format with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes and/or has a few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Most sources are cited and referenced correctly.
9.38 to >7.38 ptsBelow Expectations
The assignment generally follows current APA format with several mistakes and grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Most sources are cited and referenced incorrectly.
7.38 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
The assignment does not follow current APA format and/or has many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Sources are missing.
12.5 pts
Total Points: 125
PreviousNext

Review of a Bill Assignment
Select an active bill at the state or federal level that impacts the professional practice of nursing. In a 3-4 page paper (excluding the title and reference pages), summarize the provisions of the bill and clearly explain what the bill will accomplish. The paper should be no more than 4 pages, typed in Times New Roman using 12-point font, and double-spaced with 1″ margins.
Your review of a bill paper should:
Discuss the major provisions of the bill.
Demonstrate an in-depth understanding of the legislation by explaining the background and all relevant facts.
Discuss any relevant history related to the legislation, pertinent votes, and issues that are stalling the legislation, etc.
Use primary sources for this information.
Identify key supporters and those who do not support the bill. Explain why some of these individuals support the bill and why some do not.
Explore the positions of the key stakeholders in the bill, both pros and cons. Do not make assumptions about potential key stakeholders. Examine this area carefully so you are correctly reflecting the stakeholders positions.
Discuss how the bill would impact a nurse’s ability to provide safe and quality care or to practice to the highest scope of the nursing license.
Explain specific actions that nurses can take to assist with the passage or defeat of the legislation
Use Current APA Style, headings and references as appropriate.
Due Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time)
Rubric
NURS_510_DE – Review of a Bill
NURS_510_DE – Review of a Bill
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary of a Bill
22.5 to >18.45 ptsAccomplished
Clearly summarizes the bill’s major provisions and what the bill will accomplish.
18.45 to >16.88 ptsEmerging
The bill’s major provisions and what the bill will accomplish are included, but lacks clarity.
16.88 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactory
The bill’s major provisions and what the bill will accomplish are absent or severely lacking in detail
22.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLegislation
30 to >24.6 ptsAccomplished
Demonstrates a clear understanding of the legislation by explaining relevant facts and background information.
24.6 to >22.5 ptsEmerging
Relevant facts and background regarding legislation are included, but lacks clarity.
22.5 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactory
Relevant facts and background regarding legislation are absent or severely lacking in detail.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHistory
22.5 to >18.45 ptsAccomplished
Relevant history related to the legislation, pertinent votes, and issues related to the legislation is clearly identified.
18.45 to >16.88 ptsEmerging
Relevant history related to the legislation, pertinent votes, and issues related to the legislation is included but lacks clarity.
16.88 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactory
Relevant history related to the legislation, pertinent votes, and issues related to the legislation is absent or severely lacking in detail
22.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeKey Supporters & Stakeholders
30 to >24.6 ptsAccomplished
Key supporters and stakeholders are identified. Position of stakeholders and key supporters is clearly and accurately explained.
24.6 to >22.5 ptsEmerging
Key supporters and stakeholders are identified, and positions are explained. Explanations lack clarity.
22.5 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactory
Key supporters and stakeholders are either absent or incorrectly identified. Positions are absent or incorrectly explained.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality Care Discussion
30 to >24.6 ptsAccomplished
Informative discussion on how the bill might impact a nurse’s ability to provide care is included. Nursing specific actions that can be taken to assist with the passage or defeat of the legislation are clearly explained.
24.6 to >22.5 ptsEmerging
Basic discussion on how the bill might impact a nurse’s ability to provide care is included, but lacks details and or clarity. Nursing specific actions that can be taken to assist with the passage or defeat of the legislation are explained but lack clarity.
22.5 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactory
Basic discussion on how the bill might impact a nurse’s ability to provide care is absent or severely lacking in clarity. Nursing specific actions that can be taken to assist with the passage or defeat of the legislation are absent or incorrectly explained.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization, Writing & APA
15 to >12.3 ptsAccomplished
APA format is followed. Written in a clear, concise, formal, and organized manner. Information from sources is paraphrased appropriately and accurately cited.
12.3 to >11.25 ptsEmerging
APA format is mostly followed. Writing is generally clear and organized but is not concise or formal in language. Multiple errors exist in spelling and grammar with minor interference with readability or comprehension. Most information from sources is paraphrased and cited correctly.
11.25 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactory
APA format may not be followed. Writing is generally unclear and unorganized. Errors in spelling and grammar detract from readability and comprehension. Sources are missing or improperly cited.
15 pts
Total Points: 150
PreviousNext

_______________
After reading the assigned pages from the Victoria Business School’s “Example of a Finished Report,” you will answer a series of questions. Your responses should run 1-2 sentences per question. These questions will help you prepare for your own business report. Provide feedback for one classmate’s answers.
Please download the document, “How to Write a Business Report,” from Victoria University. The document is linked to in Content for Week 5.
Please access page 26 of the document, “An Example of a Finished Report.”
Review the report, which covers pages 27-41.
Please respond to this discussion topic by answering the following questions. Your answers can be 1-2 sentences:
What problem is the author addressing?
Where in the report does the author cite secondary research? You can mention one or two pages.
What types of primary research does the author cite in the report? You can give one or two examples. (You are not required to do primary research for your WRTG 394 writing assignments, the proposal memo and research report; however, it’s important that you know how and why this research is used in business reports.)

Imagine the online university you work for was acquired by another university and there will be many changes that need to be communicated both internally and externally. The university will have a new name, new brand, it will move from being a private institution to being a public institution; and it will be “owned” by a university with a 150-year history and a mascot.
While the university is transitioning, you are tasked with assisting in the promotion of its new brand and image. 
In this assessment, you will analyze how you can help spread the new organizational messages using digital technologies. Your analysis should consist of:
An examination of the digital technologies that would have the greatest impact for both internal and external customers. Provide specific examples.
A step-by-step plan to communicate the organizational message to internal and external customers.
A thorough review of how the message can impact internal and external customers.
Your paper should be 2–3 pages, along with a separate cover and reference page. Support your rationale with a minimum of two scholarly sources in APA format.

In your introductory paragraph, 
Explain auteur theory in your own words and why this is a useful approach to the study of film. 
Tip: review Chapter 8.3 in Film: From Watching to Seeing for a clear definition of auteur theory and why auteur theory is one useful approach to the study of film. Do you think the director is the sole owner of a film’s success or its failure?  
Describe, using Chapter 8 of the text as a reference, the criteria for what makes a director an auteur. 
Tip: review Chapter 8.3 in Film: From Watching to Seeing for a clear guide to Andrew Sarris’s criteria for auteur theory. Remember to evaluate specific examples from your chosen director’s films to decide whether or not they meet the criteria. 
Identify a director who meets the criteria posed by auteur theory. 
Example: you will identify one director and two of that director’s films: for instance, Sofia Coppola and her films The Virgin Suicides and Marie Antoinette.  
Summarize briefly the ways in which this director meets the criteria using examples from at least two of the director’s films.
Example: you have evaluated specific examples from your chosen director’s films to decide whether or not they meet the criteria. Now, name those examples: costuming, mise-en-scène, light and color, actors, and dialogue. 
Develop a thesis statement that focuses on how your chosen director and their films meet the criteria posed by auteur theory and advances the possibilities of storytelling through the medium of film. 
Tip: visit the Writing a Thesis Statement resource from the UAGC Writing Center. 
Example: In her films The Virgin Suicides and Marie Antoinette, Sofia Coppola demonstrates that she belongs among the list of auteurs for her elaborate costuming, consistent use of light and color, her reliance on actor Kirsten Dunst in the lead roles, and telling stories that focus on young women coming of age amidst formidable obstacles. 
In the body of your paper (at least three paragraphs), 
Apply the lens of auteur theory in breaking down the director’s technical competence, distinguishable personality, and interior meaning using specific examples of their work (e.g., particular scenes or plot components).
Tip: use at least one paragraph for each criteria (or two paragraphs for each criteria, one for your analysis of each of two films) to analyze specific techniques and themes that demonstrate how your director meets the three criteria of auteur theory.
Analyze the specific ways in which filmmaking techniques, consistent themes, and storytelling distinguish your chosen director as an auteur among their peers.
Example: the elaborate costumes in Coppola’s Marie Antoinette help to establish the period in which the film is set, and go beyond it by drawing particular attention to the extravagance and excess of Pre-revolutionary France. The ornate and colorful dresses worn by Kirsten Dunst’s Marie Antoinette allude to the equally colorful cakes, for which she is infamous, having said, “let them eat cake.” 
Evaluate your chosen director’s ethos, that is what they have to say about complex social and cultural issues.
Tip: the ethos is the director’s characteristic spirit, evidenced by their beliefs and aspirations. A director’s ethos is directly connected to the type of stories they tell and what they intend to communicate in telling those stories.
In the conclusion of your paper, 
Connect each element of your analysis to show how your chosen director meets the three criteria of auteur theory and what this director’s body of work has to say about social and cultural issues.
Tip: your conclusion should restate your thesis and remind the reader which specific examples demonstrate how your chosen director meets—or doesn’t meet—the criteria of auteur theory and remind us why auteur theory is a valuable tool for film analysis.

Insructions are written below
My suggestions are,
The negative impact on fast foods
or Physical education(excersizing)

help with writing a report. All instructions are in the attachment.
This is highly important. i need to cover the
1- Abstract: 2- Introduction 3: Literature Review 4-References:
and stick the word number shown in the below picture (maximum of 1000). Also, please be sure to use simple words; I’m studying English, and English is my second language.
Don’t use AI or plagiarism.
There is an example in the attachment.
My subject is: (Number 4)
investigate business students’ perspectives on the impact of lesson and tutorial attendance on academic results.
Finally Please write five questions to be used on the survey at the end of the report.