Home

Write an essay on “Do You Think Women Experience Pain
Differently Than Men? Why Do You Think This Is? 
This assignment should be in essay format, double spaced, Times
New Roman, 12 font size.  Essay should be
at least 4-5 paragraphs.  Please use
correct grammar and capitalization.
Please type your essay in a Word Document (with name, date, and
CRN at the top left side of the page). Your essay must be at least 400 words in
length and reference the APA website and/or the book. There is no need for a
reference page, just reference using the URL www.apa.com at the bottom of your essay.

Instruction
1) Introduction, litterature review of 10 articles related to the subject, proposed reseach, reference page
2)Method sections, results and discussion
Notice: Remember, cheating in this class will not be tolerated under any circumstances. This assignment is being submitted to a plagiarism checker and if your paper has a similarity index of 6% or more, you will receive an automatic 0 (zero). Keep in mind that the plagiarism checker compares your assignments to everything you can find on the web. This assignment is also being submitted to an AI detector. Points will be deducted if any part of your paper is found to have been written with AI. If your paper has an AI writing detection score of 20% or more, you will receive an automatic 0 (zero).

Daubert standard compared to the Frye standard and why.
Challenges and Implications: Explore the obstacles the courts have encountered in implementing the Daubert and Frye criteria concerning expert testimonies, especially in litigation involving brand-new and unproven scientific methods. How do these criteria hinder the capacity of the judiciary to incorporate state-of-the-art scientific and technological developments?
Ethical Considerations: Consider the ethical consequences of determining the court’s decision to allow an expert’s testimony, as per the grip of Frye’s rigid rule or Daubert’s more pliable principles. Are these directives based on providing real help or aiding the opposite in pursuing justice? Especially when the case revolves around a critical issue of guilt or innocence and is backed by scientific evidence, can the jury be fully convinced by satisfying the standard?
Faith vs. Science in Legal Proceedings: From a biblical standpoint, how can one reconcile the reliance on scientific evidence, as scrutinized under the Daubert and Frye standards, with the biblical principles of truth and justice? Consider the story of Solomon’s wisdom in 1 Kings 3:16-28 as a basis for discussing the integration of wisdom, discernment, and evidence in making just decisions. How might Solomon’s approach inform our understanding of the balance between scientific evidence and moral judgment in legal proceedings?
Your response should be four to five pages written in standard APA format and submitted as a Word document. Your response should be supported by a minimum of two outside references and cited accordingly.
Scroll down to the bottom of the page and click on add a file, then click submit to upload your assignment by the posted due date. Review the rubric for specific grading criteria.
Due on Jun 16, 2024 11:59 PM