Home

introdution , why u choosing nursing cariera goals, present , education expierence, two workshops (sals, academing writing,) reflection inthe text citation included,

This assignment will enable you to describe a plan proposal that includes an analysis of best practices of interprofessional collaboration, change theory, leadership strategies, and organizational resources, including a financial budget, that can be used to solve the problem identified in the health care professional interview you conducted.
Overview
Having reviewed the information gleaned from your professional interview and identified the issue, you will determine and present a plan for an interdisciplinary intervention to address the issue. While you will not be expected to implement the plan during this course, the plan should be evidence-based and realistic within the context of the issue and your interviewee’s organization.
The goal of this assignment is to clearly lay out the improvement objective for your interdisciplinary intervention. Be sure to build on the leadership, change, and collaboration research you completed in the previous assignment. Look for specific, real-world ways in which those strategies and best practices could be used to generate buy-in for the plan or improve the implementation of the plan.
Instructions
Use the context of the organization where you conducted your interview to develop a viable plan for an interdisciplinary team to address the issue you identified. Define a specific organizational or patient outcome based on the information gathered in your interview.
Using the Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal Template [DOCX] will help you stay organized and concise. As you complete each section of the template, apply APA format to in-text citations for the evidence and best practices that inform your plan, as well as to the reference list at the end.
Be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the rubric. Please study the rubric carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.
Describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific goal related to improving patient or organizational outcomes.
Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that is most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan.
Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving the plan’s objective. Include best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature.
Explain organizational resources, including a financial budget, needed for the plan to succeed and the impacts on those resources if the improvements described in the plan are not made.
Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.
Additional Requirements
Length of submission: Use the template. Remember that part of this assignment is to make the plan easy to understand and use, so it is critical that you are clear and concise. Most submissions will be 2–4 pages in length. Be sure to include a reference page at the end of the plan.
Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than 5 years old. See the BSN Program Library Research Guide.
APA formatting: Make sure that in-text citations and reference list follow current APA style. See the APA Module.
You may choose to save this assignment to your ePortfolio.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
Competency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and financial resources to promote organizational health.
Explain organizational resources, including a financial budget, needed for the plan to succeed and the impacts on those resources if nothing is done to address the improvements sought by the plan.
Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.
Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving the plan’s objective. Include best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature.
Competency 3: Describe ways to incorporate evidence-based practice within an interdisciplinary team.
Describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific goal related to improving patient or organizational outcomes.
Competency 4: Explain how change-management theories and leadership strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific organizational goals.
Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that are most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan.
Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.
Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

Touchstones are projects that illustrate your comprehension of the course material, help you refine skills, and demonstrate application of knowledge. You can work on a Touchstone anytime, however, you must pass the previous Activities before you can submit the Touchstone for grading. Once you’ve submitted a Touchstone, it will be graded and counted toward your final course score.
Touchstone: Homeostatic Control: How does the human body keep itself in balance Lab Report
ASSIGNMENT: In this unit, you will complete the lab titled Homeostatic Control: How does the human body keep itself in balance? . You will write a lab report describing the hypothesis, methods, and conclusions from this lab experience.
By completing the lab report, you will demonstrate your ability to do the following:
Describe the lab’s overall objective and make a hypothesis.
Introduce relevant background knowledge on the topic.
Summarize the steps taken in the lab simulation.
Explain any obtained results.
Discuss the conclusions and implications.
Download the lab report file:
Lab Report – Homeostatic Control: How does the human body keep itself in balance?
The document is a Microsoft Word file. You will type your answers directly into the boxes provided.
IMPORTANT: You must submit this completed template file as your Touchstone. Any other submission file or format will be returned ungraded.
In order to foster learning and growth, all work you submit must be newly written specifically for this course. Any plagiarized or recycled work will result in a Plagiarism Detected alert. Review Touchstones: Academic Integrity Guidelines for more about plagiarism and the Plagiarism Detected alert. For guidance on the use of generative AI technology, review Ethical Standards and Appropriate Use of AI.
A. Directions
Step 1: Download and review the lab report file.
Step 2: Complete each part of the lab report file as you work through the simulation. Prompts in the lab report will help you develop your responses.
Follow the process presented to you in the How to Write a Lab Report lesson to ensure you write a thorough lab report entry.
Review the grading rubric (below) to make sure you have an understanding of how your lab report will be graded.
Step 3: Once you’ve completed the lab simulation and your lab report, review the submission requirements (below) and update your lab report to ensure it meets the recommended requirements.
Step 4: Once your lab report template is complete, submit it for grading.
Refer to the checklist below throughout the Touchstone process. Do not submit your Touchstone until you meet these guidelines.
❒ Did you review the Lab Manual before starting the simulation?
❒ Did you complete the lab simulation?
❒ Did you refer to the lesson on How to Write a Lab Report?
❒ Did you complete all 5 sections of the Lab Report file?
❒ Did you review the Touchstone rubric and compare it to your lab report?
❒ Did you submit the provided Lab Report file as your Touchstone for grading?
B. Rubric
Advanced (100%) Proficient (85%) Acceptable (75%) Needs Improvement (50%) Non-Performance (0%)
Objective and Hypothesis (45 pts)
Describe the overall objective of the simulation and make a hypothesis (if applicable).
Clearly describes the purpose of the simulation and makes a hypothesis. Purpose and hypothesis are well-aligned with the simulation and are paraphrased in the student’s own words. Describes the purpose of the simulation and makes a hypothesis. Both are aligned with the simulation and are paraphrased in the student’s own words, but are less clear and specific. Describes a purpose and a hypothesis that are only loosely aligned with the simulation. Either the description of the simulation’s purpose or the hypothesis is missing, or they are not paraphrased in the student’s own words. Does not describe the purpose of the simulation or a hypothesis. Response may be totally off-topic or absent.
Background Knowledge (45 pts)
Introduce relevant background knowledge on the topic described in the simulation.
Lists at least 3 examples of relevant background knowledge on the topic from the simulation Lab Manual or other resources. Lists at least 2 examples of relevant background knowledge on the topic from the simulation Lab Manual or other resources. Lists at least 1 example of relevant background knowledge on the topic from the simulation Lab Manual or other resources. Lists at least 1 example but its connection to the simulation is unclear. Response does not offer any background knowledge on simulation. Response may be totally off-topic or absent.
Summary and Steps (45 pts)
Summarize the steps taken in the simulation.
Summarizes all steps taken in the simulation and all equipment and techniques used. Summary is organized in a way that the reader understands the logical flow of the lab. Summarizes most of the steps taken in the simulation and lists some equipment and techniques used. Summary is organized in a way that the reader mostly understands the logical flow of the lab. Summarizes some of the steps taken in the simulation and lists some of the equipment and techniques used. Summary is organized in a way that the reader somewhat understands the logical flow of the lab. Summary is missing most of the steps in the simulation and most of the equipment and techniques used. Summary may contradict the simulation or be organized illogically. Summary does not include any steps taken in the simulation, or equipment and techniques used. Response may be totally off-topic or absent.
Results (45 pts)
Explain the obtained results from the simulation
Accurately explains most of the obtained results of the simulation, if the results were expected or unexpected, and why. Accurately explains some of the obtained results of the simulation, and if the results were expected or unexpected. Explains some of the results of the simulation, but may contain some inaccuracies. Does not explain if the results were expected or unexpected. Explanation of results is entirely inaccurate or contradicts the simulation. Does not explain if the results were expected or unexpected. Does not explain any obtained results or if the results were expected or unexpected. Response may be totally off-topic or absent.
Conclusions and Implications (45 pts)
Discusses the conclusions and implications of the simulation.
Clearly and specifically summarizes how the results of the simulation relate to the original purpose and hypothesis; correctly identifies systematic sources of error; and reflects on what was learned. Summarizes the results of the simulation but their relationship to the original purpose and hypothesis may be less clear; correctly identifies systematic sources of error; and reflects on what was learned. Completes 2 of 3 tasks: summarizes how the results of the simulation relate to the original purpose and hypothesis; correctly identifies systematic sources of error; and reflects on what was learned. Completes 1 of 3 tasks: summarizes how the results of the simulation relate to the original purpose and hypothesis; correctly identifies systematic sources of error; and reflects on what was learned. Completes none of the tasks. Response may be totally off-topic or absent.
Conventions and Proofreading (25 pts)
Submission follows conventions for standard written English.
There are almost no errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization. There are minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization that do not impede readability. There are frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization that somewhat impede readability. There are consistent errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization that significantly impede readability. Submission does not meet the minimum threshold for points to be awarded.
C. Requirements
The following requirements must be met for your submission to be graded:
Use the provided lab report file completed with a readable 11- or 12-point font.
Composition must be original and written for this assignment and all writing must be appropriate for an academic context.
Plagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited.
Submission must include your name and the date.
Only submit the completed lab report file saved in .doc or .dox format as your assignment submission.
D. Additional Resources
The following resources will be helpful to you as you work on this assignment:
The Scientific Method Lesson
How to Write a Lab Report Lesson