Home

Make this sound like a human wrote it. In Tim Burton’s “Big Fish,” the exploration of truth and its perception is woven intricately into the fabric of the narrative, driven primarily by the contrasting perspectives of Will and Edward Bloom. Through their divergent approaches to truth, the film delves into the complexities of storytelling, memory, and the subjective nature of reality. Will, the skeptical son, and Edward, the larger-than-life father, embody distinct philosophical stances on truth, leading to a profound exploration of the nature of reality and the power of narrative to shape our understanding of it.
Will, portrayed by Billy Crudup in the present timeline of the film, serves as the audience’s entry point into the story. He is characterized by his rationality, skepticism, and a deep-seated desire for truth and authenticity. Throughout the film, Will grapples with his father’s penchant for embellishment and storytelling, which he perceives as a barrier to understanding the “real” Edward Bloom. Will’s quest for truth manifests as a journey to unravel the elaborate tales his father has spun over the years, seeking to uncover the man behind the myth. On the other hand, Edward Bloom, portrayed by Ewan McGregor in his youth and Albert Finney in old age, embodies a diametrically opposed perspective on truth. Edward is a consummate storyteller, whose life is characterized by a series of fantastical adventures and improbable encounters. For Edward, truth is not confined to factual accuracy but is rather a fluid and malleable concept shaped by the power of imagination and the transformative potential of storytelling. He embraces the notion of subjective truth, believing that the essence of an experience lies not in its factual details but in the emotional truths it evokes. The tension between Will’s quest for factual truth and Edward’s embrace of subjective truth forms the thematic core of “Big Fish.” As Will delves deeper into his father’s past, he encounters a series of outlandish anecdotes that challenge his preconceived notions of reality. Each story becomes a battleground between Will’s skepticism and Edward’s romanticism, highlighting the inherent subjectivity of truth and the role of perception in shaping our understanding of the world. However, as the narrative unfolds, Will begins to recognize the deeper truths embedded within his father’s stories. He discovers that while the specifics may be exaggerated or embellished, the underlying emotions and themes are grounded in genuine human experiences. Through his interactions with characters from his father’s past, Will gains a new perspective on Edward’s life, realizing that the stories, though fantastical, hold valuable insights into his father’s character and motivations.
By the film’s conclusion, Will undergoes a profound transformation, recognizing the inherent value of his father’s storytelling legacy. He comes to understand that truth is not a binary concept but rather a multifaceted phenomenon that encompasses both objective facts and subjective interpretations. Will learns to appreciate the power of narrative as a means of preserving memories, imparting wisdom, and forging connections with others. In embracing his father’s stories, Will reconciles with the complexities of their relationship and gains a newfound appreciation for the richness of life’s experiences. In essence, “Big Fish” serves as a meditation on the nature of truth and its perception, inviting viewers to contemplate the interplay between fact and fiction, memory and imagination. Through the contrasting perspectives of Will and Edward Bloom, the film illuminates the inherent subjectivity of truth and celebrates the transformative power of storytelling to transcend reality’s confines. Ultimately, “Big Fish” suggests that while truth may be elusive and subjective, the stories we tell have the power to shape our understanding of the world and illuminate the human condition in profound and meaningful ways.
The film’s exploration of truth extends beyond the dichotomy between Will and Edward, delving into the role of memory and nostalgia in shaping personal narratives. Throughout the film, Edward’s stories serve as a lens through which he constructs his identity and grapples with the passage of time. His larger-than-life tales not only entertain but also serve as a form of self-mythologizing, allowing him to preserve and immortalize moments from his past. In this sense, Edward’s storytelling becomes an act of self-preservation, a means of holding onto cherished memories and crafting a narrative of his life that is both meaningful and enduring. However, as Will confronts his father’s stories with skepticism and scrutiny, he begins to question the reliability of memory and the authenticity of Edward’s narrative. Will’s quest for truth is driven by a desire to uncover the “real” Edward Bloom, untainted by embellishment or exaggeration. Yet, in his pursuit of objective truth, Will overlooks the emotional truths embedded within his father’s stories – truths about love, sacrifice, and the complexities of human relationships. It is only through his journey of exploration and reconciliation that Will comes to appreciate the profound impact of his father’s storytelling legacy and the enduring truths it contains.
By the film’s conclusion, both Will and Edward undergo a transformation, albeit in different ways. Will learns to embrace the subjective nature of truth, recognizing that while facts may fade, the emotional resonance of storytelling endures. He comes to understand that his father’s stories, though fantastical, are rooted in genuine human experiences and hold valuable insights into the complexities of life. Conversely, Edward confronts the limitations of his own narrative, acknowledging the need to reconcile with the past and accept the impermanence of life. In the final moments of the film, as Edward recounts his ultimate tale – the story of his own death – he embraces the role of the storyteller, weaving a narrative that transcends the boundaries of time and mortality. In conclusion, “Big Fish” offers a poignant exploration of truth and its perception, inviting viewers to contemplate the interplay between fact and fiction, memory and imagination. Through the contrasting perspectives of Will and Edward Bloom, the film illuminates the subjective nature of truth and celebrates the transformative power of storytelling to shape our understanding of the world. Ultimately, “Big Fish” reminds us that while truth may be elusive and subjective, the stories we tell have the power to transcend reality and illuminate the human experience in profound and meaningful ways. 

Summary:
Reading Assignment 1 – CER Evidence Based Writing
WRITE YOUR RESPONSE (In paragraph form. Minimum 5/6 sentences & Maximum 10/15 sentence).
Begin your response with the topic sentence (Ex: Why you agree/disagree with the statement. Then explain the context, provide evidence (Last name, year, p.), explain your evidence, show relationship between your evidence and topic sentence, and provide a concluding sentence.
ASSIGNMENT TOPIC
Schumann (1976, p.136) hypothesizes that when the social distance between two cultures is great, the learner will have more difficulty learning the second language” (as cited in Wintergerst & McVeigh, 2011, p. 91). 
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.
GRADING CRITERIA 
1. Cover page (Reading Assignment 1, Your full name, Instructor’s full name, student ID, School’s name, Topic Question.)
2. Topic sentence
3. Context
4. Evidence 1
5. Evidence 2
6. Explain your evidence
7. Show how your evidence is related to topic sentence
8. Concluding sentence
9. Format (Double space, use a word document, spacing, font size and style)
10. Typographical errors (spelling, punctuation, capitalization, etc.)