Home

Ghana/Agriculture
Project topic (one country/sector combination chosen from the instructor’s list):- Topic Is Ghana Agriculture 3. Three bullet points about the country’s demographic, political-economic, and historic background (each bullet point should be 3-4 sentences and use at least 1 in-text citation).
4. Three bullet points about what the sector is and its contribution to the country’s people and economy (each bullet point should be 3-4 sentences and use at least 1 in-text citation).
5. An image showing one map that you think might be relevant in Section 1.
6. A working reference list listed alphabetically and in bibliographic format. The list must be at least 5 references long and include:
a) anything cited in answers to 3., 4., and 5. above; and
b) at least two references that include surface temperature and other climate model projections for your country generated between 2014-present (please highlight these in yellow so that they can be easily identified during grading). You may select your preferred referencing style, but it must be used correctly and consistently.
Instructions:
Make sure to provide references in proper APA Style.
Donot use chatgpt and AI software as mam has software to detect each and every line.
software at all as I have attached the proporsal
Grading criterai Sections 1 and 2(2 points) Complete and accurateN/AN/AN/A(0 points) Incomplete and/or inaccurate
Section 3(2 points) Length and content guidelines met; background provided is accurate and relevant; in-text citation requirement met.(1.5 points) Length and content guidelines met; background provided is accurate; in-text citation requirement met.(1 point) Length and content guidelines met; background provided is unclear and/or irrelevant; in-text citation requirement met.(0.5 points) Length and content guidelines not met and/or in-text citation requirement not met; background provided is unclear and/or irrelevant.(0 points) Length and content guidelines not met, background provided is unclear and/or irrelevant, in-text citation requirement not met.
Section 4(2 points) Length and content guidelines met; contribution/contributions identified are accurate and relevant; in-text citation requirement met.(1.5 points) Length and content guidelines met; contribution/contributions identified are accurate; in-text citation requirement met.(1 point) Length and content guidelines met; contribution/contributions identified are unclear and/or irrelevant; in-text citation requirement met.(0.5 points) Length and content guidelines not met and/or in-text citation requirement not met; contribution/contributions identified are unclear and/or irrelevant.(0 points) Length and content guidelines not met, contribution/contributions identified are unclear and/or irrelevant, in-text citation requirement not met.
Section 5(4 points) Image is clear and fully legible; it is evident that the map will be very relevant to Section 1 (e.g., it visualizes key demographic and/or political-economic and/or historic information about the country); the map is from a reputable source and that source is listed underneath the image in in-text citation form.(3 points) Image is clear and mostly legible; the map may be relevant to Section 1 (e.g., it visualizes information about the country, but the immediate connection to one or more of demographics, political-economy, and history is not clear); the map is from a reputable source and that source is listed underneath the image in in-text citation form.(2 points) Image is not clear or legible; it is not likely that the map will be relevant to Section 1 (e.g., it does not visualize any information about the country); the map is from a reputable source and that source is listed underneath the image in in-text citation form.(1 point) Image is not clear or legible; it is not likely that the map will be relevant to Section 1 (e.g., it does not visualize any information about the country); the map source is unclear and/or unreputable; that source is listed underneath the image in in-text citation form.(0 points) Image is not clear or legible; it is not likely that the map will be relevant to Section 1 (e.g., it does not visualize any information about the country); the map source is unclear and/or unreputable and the source is not listed underneath the image in in-text citation form.
Section 6(5 points) List is at least five references long, is ordered alphabetically, and is in proper/consistent bibliographic format; the list includes all pieces cited in answers to 3., 4., and 5.; the list includes at least two references, highlighted in yellow, that contain surface temperature and other climate model projections for the student’s country; these projections were generated and/or published between 2014-present.

discuss about these criticisms about world heritage sites protection:
1. negative effects of increased tourism(the inability to control flood of tourists the flock to see the sites once they have official status)
2. site listing bids are often lengthy and costly, putting poorer countries at a disadvantage(more sites in wealthy EU countries)